Boris Sokolov: an outstanding historian and literary critic or a skilled faker?

Sokolov Boris Vadimovich - Russian literary critic, historian, literary critic. The results of his literary work cause a lot of controversy. What is remarkable about his books and why he became unfit for Russian power? His life path and creativity will be discussed in this article.

Biography: Boris Sokolov

Boris was born in Moscow on January 2, 1957. In 1979 he graduated from Moscow State University (Geographical Faculty), and later, in 1986, defended his thesis and received a Ph.D. in History from the Institute of Ethnography of the USSR Academy of Sciences. In 1992 he became a doctor of philology, defending his work in the same Moscow State University.

He worked as a professor at the Department of Social Anthropology at the Russian State Social University. Boris Sokolov is a member of the Russian PEN Center and AIRO-XXI, columnist of the newspaper "Jewish Word" and the permanent author of the site "Grani.ru", the author of about 100 articles and 60 books on Russian literature and Soviet history. His works are not only in Russian, they are also translated into English, Japanese, Polish, Estonian and Latvian. For a long time he was a member of the Free Historical Society Boris Sokolov.

Books of the literary critic

The work of the Russian literary critic covers many works, among them: the books "The Mysteries of Russian Writers", "The Broken Bulgakov: Secrets of the" Master and Margarita "," The Second World: Versions and Facts "," 100 Great Wars "," Occupation: Truth and Myths " "," Secrets of the Finnish War "," 100 Great Politicians "," Great Gandhi. The Righteous Power "," Wolf Messing "," Secrets of the Second World "," My book about Vladimir Sorokin ", the encyclopedia" Gogol "and" Bulgakov "and others.

Boris Sokolov described the biographies of great personalities: Sergei Esenin, Joseph Stalin, Adolf Hitler, Peter Wrangel, Winston Churchill, Lavrenty Beria, Fedor Dostoyevsky, Boris Pasternak, Georgy Zhukov, Nadezhda Krupskaya, Konstantin Rokossovsky, Heinrich Himmler, Mikhail Tukhachevsky, Inessa Armand, Seeds of Budyonny, prophetess Vanga, etc. Many of the author's works give completely unpredictable answers to questions concerning the biographical data of his heroes.

"Did Saakashvili lose?": The opinion of B. Sokolov

In 2008, after the publication of the article "Did Saakashvili lose," he completed his cooperation with the RSSU. Sokolov claimed in his publication that Russia would in any case have found an excuse for a military operation against Georgia. The government of the Russian Federation would have played a different scenario and would have captured Tbilisi in a day, even if there had been no Georgian strike against Tskhinval.

The author of the article in his publication called Saakashvili's actions not only "rational, but also the only correct ones for the salvation of his land." Sokolov believes that Mikhail Saakashvili decided to start the war on the first day of the Olympics, where the Russian prime minister was present (the president was on vacation on the Volga at the time), thereby preventing the potential enemy. Russian troops had to fight off Tskhinval within a few days, instead of immediately invading Georgia. Boris Sokolov assures that this plan was developed in advance, and he undoubtedly victorious in this conflict, Georgia, because "she now has chances for joining NATO as never before." But Russia, according to the author, lost.

After publication of the publication, Sokolov was asked to write a letter of resignation at his own request. According to him, this happened after a call to the administration of the Presidential Administration. The article was immediately removed from the newspaper's website.

The accusation of the historian in the incorrectness

Boris Sokolov acted as an expert in the film The Soviet Story, which caused numerous controversy and accusations of falsifications and manipulations. In 2010, signed an appeal by the opposition that Putin must leave. In 2015, commented on the accession of the Crimea to the Russian Federation: "Russia took the territory, which, in fact, it does not need. Territory, which does not bear any value for the country - neither cultural, nor economic, nor military-strategic. " Because of such frank statements in May 2016, he was accused of incorrectly citing other people's works, improper handling of sources and expelled from the Free Historical Society.

Inaccuracies in the data: accident or falsification?

Some writers claim that Sokolov's works contain many errors and inaccuracies. Many publicists, sociologists and historians, the data on the losses of the Red Army in the years of the Second World War, which Sokolov cites in his publications, are considered unreliable. In the book "The Price of Victory" Sokolov counts the dead warriors of the USSR and Nazi Germany. However, the methodology by which he does this is rather inaccurate and, as was proved later by other researchers, significantly distorts the real figures. In particular, when Sokolov counted the losses of Russian soldiers.

Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences Osipov Gennady says that Boris Sokolov is a historian, therefore he must only operate on proven facts, and he does not understand what. All of his calculations he called absurd, and his own - "indefatigable professional falsifier." Nevertheless, Sokolov's work is worthy of attention. In his books the reader will find many interesting and new, will discover historical chronicles on the other hand, unravel many puzzles of the great works of world literature.

Instead of concluding

In any case, the reader, you will get acquainted with the work of Boris Sokolov or someone else, draw conclusions not on the basis of other people's opinions and stereotypes, but on the basis of your own analysis and experience.