"My attitude to Pechorin": an essay on the novel "The Hero of Our Time"

The composition "My attitude to Pechorin" has been asked for many years to write to students at school. And this is not accidental. In Russian literature for more than a century and a half, M.Yu. Lermontov under the name "Hero of Our Time". Why is it still not obsolete? What can this work be useful for people in the beginning of the 21st century?

What are the features of the work "My Attitude to Pechorin"? First of all, it should be based not only on personal feelings, but also on the analysis of the text, the actual material. A good job is to analyze the causes and consequences of the actions of the protagonist. It is on it that the work "My attitude to Pechorin" should be built. The composition with examples, quotations, analysis of the text is estimated much higher.

The relevance of the work today

Lermontov called his work very successful, so the reader is already warned in advance that the protagonist of the work is modern. Longevity of the novel testifies that this is indeed the great creation of Lermontov. It has already outgrown the framework of its era thanks to the fact that Mikhail Yurievich showed in it the main laws of human life that act at all times. The heroes in the work ask the most important questions, they decide not the short-term, but eternal problems on which humanity will reflect in the future. All this can be written in the introduction of the work on the topic "My attitude to Pechorin." The essay should represent in general outline the work described.

Do heroic dedication matter to the main character of the work?

First of all, the question of the meaning of life pertains to eternal questions. After analyzing the work, we can say that his characters respond very differently to him. However, who can be considered the real hero of the work? Since the central place in the novel belongs to the image of Pechorin, we can say with confidence that this word, first of all, refers to it. Can we consider him a man, an outstanding valor and bravery, performing selfless feats? In the novel about his courage, there is evidence - the story of Maxim Maksimych, who saw how he "went to the wild boar" alone. However, "feats" and "dedication" are concepts that have nothing to do with his life. The composition "My attitude to Pechorin" should also include evidence of this thesis. For example, Pechorin himself in the magazine, which can be considered his confession to himself, says that he did not sacrifice anything for anyone. This applies even to love. He loved this hero exclusively himself, and if he was fond of another person, then again for himself, for the sake of his pleasure. And deeds, which can be called insanely brave: dueling, Bela's abduction, romance novels - can in no way be called feats, as they carried the greatest suffering or death to people.

Ax in the hands of fate

Pechorin himself notices this and says that he acts as an ax in the hands of fate. He acts "always without regret," "often without malice." "Without anger" here means not under the influence of passion, not accidentally, but prudently and coldly. "Without regret" - in him it is especially scary, because it shows indifference to human grief. In addition, it is his habitual state of mind: the icy desert, which under the layer of permafrost harbors all life.

How Pechorin destroyed the destinies of others

The main character was aware that he was the cause of many troubles and often even tragedies for people whose lives he was touching. The main occupation of this person is to make others unhappy: Grushnitsky and Bela perish, Princess Mary seriously suffers, Bela's father, Bela's father, who was slain by Kazbich's hand, is a victim of this hero's treachery. Even Maxim Maksimych, who shows friendly feelings towards him, like no other, is deeply offended at them. The life habitual for "honest smugglers" is destroyed, there is only one blind boy, which also turns into a tragedy for him.

Why did Pechorin miserable people?

The logical question arises: "What was the purpose of these actions, why did he intervene in the lives of others and destroy them?" For your own pleasure, for boredom. In the work it can be mentioned that this statement makes Pechorin extremely unattractive, and also dangerous for society. Only in order to get rid of boredom, he transgresses moral laws, goes against his conscience, commits even criminal offenses. At the same time, Pechorin does not feel guilty, justifying his behavior by the bad morals prevailing in society, which he allegedly spoiled.

Weakness and pride of Pechorin

However, as a strong organism will not affect the disease, it will not be exerted by external influences of destructive influence on the soul, which has a high morality and inner strength. From this we can conclude that the soul of Pechorin turned out to be weak, in good not rooted. This can also be noted in the work "My attitude to Pechorin." The work on "The Hero of Our Time" is very interesting to write - the author reveals the psychology of heroes very deeply. A terrible result is self-justification: Pechorin has no objection to playing the role of a tool of execution for people. Power over them like this hero, he loves to torment people. All these features are the result of terrible pride, which still does not give his peace of mind, since Pechorin also does not experience happiness. He is haunted by the boredom of life, which torments, induces senseless adventures, and in the end Pechorin perishes. He deserved it. Such a conclusion can be made in the work "My attitude to Pechorin." Lermontov's composition does not coincide with the early death of the hero. His life ends because there is nothing to live for this man, all the powers of his weak soul have been spent on empty entertainment. So he did not find in his existence a high sense, which, by his own admission, he suspected and said in himself that for this he was given spiritual strength, health, and intelligence. Life was wasted in vain, not bearing fruit, leaving no good memory for itself. And is that a hero?

In what sense is Pechorin still a hero?

However, we will not rush to conclusions and refuse him in this definition. "My attitude to Pechorin" is an essay that should not be one-sided. Let's consider one more meaning of the given word. "Hero" also means a person who embodies the characteristic features of the environment or era. This value to Pechorin also does not apply - it differs sharply from the others. In the novel he is lonely. Approaches to this character only the following two meanings: the hero as the main character and how attracting attention to himself. Lermontov himself clearly sympathizes with Pechorin. He admires his mind, his knowledge of people, his courage. It will only be a plus in your work, if you note the attitude of Lermontov to Pechorin. I was pleased with the composition of this image. The received hero has outstanding abilities. However, his death is inevitable - he is dead soul.

Pechorin is a hero of our time. In people's lives, little has changed since then. As then there was little thought about for what we exist for, so now the situation has not changed. Ideals Lermontov time (fame, career, wealth) remain relevant and now. The protagonist saw human shortcomings, which can also be indicated in the work "My attitude to Pechorin." The composition can be ended by the fact that now many people follow the principle: "Live in a buzz!" However, few of them are happy, because only serving high ideals and goals, love for people, self-sacrifice for their sake, a sense of duty bring a feeling of fullness of life and happiness.

These are just the main recommendations how to write a paper on the topic "My attitude to Pechorin" (composition). In the novel "The Hero of Our Time," however, there are no unambiguous estimates. Therefore, you can argue with some opinions, present your own point of view. "My attitude to Pechorin" (composition according to plan) is an interesting topic that can be developed for a long time.