The problem of peace and disarmament, preventing nuclear war

Only the process of globalization has finally begun to bring to the people one simple truth: we have one planet. If it is destroyed, there will be nowhere to live elementary. Everyone will die. Therefore, the problem of peace and disarmament is so acute. It would seem that it's much easier: to get together and agree. In the UN, meetings are constantly held, responsible and wise people are trying to reduce the level of tension on the planet, and new foci of it arise that mushrooms after the rain. And each time we have to discuss together how the problem of peace and disarmament, the prevention of nuclear war , can be solved . Let's look at the root and try to look at the forest behind the trees.

Global problems

To begin with, mankind has created enough of its own difficulties. These are those complex tasks, the non-resolution of which will lead to the disappearance of the human race along with the shining blue planet. And among them, the problem of peace and disarmament is at the forefront. Different specialists number up to four dozen unsolved problems. Some are extremely acute, while others do not affect our lives so much. For simplicity, they are generalized into several categories. Namely:

• Ecological,
• Demographic,
• Energy,
• Preservation of peace,
• Food,
• Development of the ocean and outer space.

Agree, each of these groups of tasks concerns the entire population of the planet. Without food or water, clean air or energy, few will survive. Although, of course, the split groups will remain, so long as the planet does not scatter to pieces. Therefore, the problem of peace and disarmament is put forward by politicians and scientists to the very first plan. Why?

Global humanity

We have already said that the problem of peace and disarmament concerns every inhabitant of the Earth. The fact is that as many weapons as now have never existed. Even at the end of the last century, when the two superpowers decided to reduce the level of tension and agree on the destruction of a certain part of their arsenals. The most formidable weapon is nuclear. But now they are officially owned by seven countries. In fact, eight or more. It is clear that not every nuclear state is capable of destroying the planet. Yes, this is not required in modern conditions. You see, there are so many "hot spots" on the planet that if a fire flares up in one place, the fire will burn instantly. That is, launching a combat rocket will result in the pressing of red buttons in all nuclear states. Let's talk about this in more detail to make it clear.

Geopolitics in a nutshell

We will not delve into the difference between the sea and the mainland civilizations. To understand what is the problem of peace and disarmament, prevention of nuclear war, this is not necessary. And we should consider the state of the planet in terms of sovereignty. Let's say that every power has it in its entirety. Consequently, countries are trying to solve their own problems, develop and so on. Other people's interests are a secondary matter. But after all, humanity has a history. It does not consist only of peaceful centuries and the full prosperity of peoples. All with accuracy to "vice versa." In our common history, many bloody events, territorial disputes, genocide and other troubles. All this leads to the appearance of so-called stress points. Countries argue over borders or resources, can not forget old grievances or long-standing wars. You see, any people can be quickly pushed to war. Therefore, the problem of peace and disarmament is so acute.

The nature of the problem

But so far we have considered only one nuance of the task facing humanity. In fact, everything here is much more complicated. Yes, national interests have to be taken into account. But their historical, so to speak, roots are burdened with economic difficulties. If earlier countries could live more or less acceptable, using their own resources, now it is becoming increasingly difficult. And there are examples. North Korea, isolated from the world, lives extremely poorly. To her from the general achievements of civilization only crumbs get. The population suffers from this. The problem of disarmament and peace on earth is not to resolve disputes or remove obstacles to the development of individual countries. The essence of the matter is to build a system in which an independent mechanism for neutralizing the causes of conflicts will work. That is, the creation of a new society, where weapons are not required. Agree, the task is huge. Unfortunately, like a century ago, we are still at the beginning of the road.

Why is our global society so organized?

To understand whether the problem of peace and disarmament has a solution, the reasons for its emergence need to be investigated carefully and comprehensively. It is believed that it was created by its two superpowers: the USSR and the United States. In the last century, after the invention of a nuclear bomb, they staged an arms race. That is, they tried to crush each other with the number of missiles and charges, the perfection of carriers, bearing in mind that it is not necessary to apply them. Believe, crazy, confident that a permanent nuclear war is possible, there is not much in politics. However, the situation developed rapidly, ending with the creation of a completely unnecessary number of weapons of mass destruction. It, we hope, will never go into action. However, to overturn humanity in the abyss of regression and its availability is enough.

The economic aspect

Weapons are expensive. It must be produced, tested (we do not talk about the invention), but also to maintain it. And this means huge spending on specialized scientific institutions, military units, factories, mining and processing enterprises. All this costs not just money. The sums for the maintenance of nuclear arsenals are enormous. Of course, some object, the work of the military-industrial complex is jobs. That is, people receive a place of service and wages. But does such activity benefit humanity? In the world, many countries produce and buy weapons. In fact, they spend precious resources not on development, but on death. Let's face it: it's not progress in the civilizational sense, it's crazy. However, the system does not change. Conflicts are many, therefore, the demand in the arms market does not fall. Well, the producers need it. They earn money. And few people think or count how much bread or other useful and necessary things could be produced instead of weapons. How much happier would the planet be.

Let's focus on conspiracy theories

Understanding how the problem of disarmament and the preservation of peace can be solved, we will inevitably come across a simple question: who needs it? Exploring it, you will understand that only ordinary people are interested in this. The owners of the MIC or banks have a different opinion on this matter. Conspirologists have united these people by the term "global predictor". It is believed that there is a kind of "world's top" that conceptually influences the processes on the planet. Here's a war it will not hurt. The fact is that people have become too much. And the trouble is not even that they have nothing to feed, as they sometimes write in the media. The question is different. It is normal to control, according to scientists, a little more than two billion people. If society becomes more (and this has already happened), then its collective unconscious will escape from the influence of manipulators. It will be impossible to keep it under control. It will develop independently, giving birth and realizing ideas. Unpredictability is extremely dangerous - we are trying to inspire "rulers" through the media. Conspiracy experts are sure that they do not need a solution to the problem of peace and disarmament. What for? It is better to slightly thin out humanity, so that it becomes more obedient.

Ecological aspect

The global problem of peace and disarmament, as already noted, is reflected on the whole planet. It's easy to see, for a while after the news tape. Then, at one or another point of the globe, armed clashes erupt. They, of course, not only take their lives. The surrounding landscape is also collapsing, becoming a lifeless desert. People leave their lands, stop processing them and develop them. And while we are talking only about conventional weapons. Imagine what will happen when nuclear bombs are used. In addition, resources have to be extracted at an ever-increasing rate, destroying subsoil, changing the ecology. But they are finite. Future generations can get a lifeless, dug up the length and breadth of the planet. But that's not all.

Emergence of new conflict situations

There is a theatrical wisdom that says that if there is a gun on the wall, it will shoot. In our case, it is quite applicable. The number of weapons circulating around the planet is such that the hotheads are only waiting for the chance to use it. Old grievances are superimposed on old problems. For example, if we consider the situation in the Middle East, everything will become clearer. After the destruction of Libya and Iraq, there is an ongoing war. In this region, there is not a day without victims. People flee to Europe, creating there also social tension. In addition, the militants of IGIL hold demonstrative actions with cut off heads and destroyed shrines. Peoples just deliberately squabble with each other. Muslims with Christians, Shiites with Sunnis, Arabs with Jews. And the output is not visible. In Africa, the same thing happens. And last year a bleeding wound appeared in the center of Europe. In Ukraine, there is a war.

The problem of peace and disarmament: solutions

It is unlikely that the whole complexity of the situation can be brought to the reader in one small article. Its roots are deep, there are many players, each of them tries to insist on its own right. What to do? Blink and wait for Armageddon? Of course not. In any case, politicians who took responsibility for their peoples do not sit idly by. The world community has long come to the idea that it is possible to solve the problem only together. It is necessary to conduct an ongoing, not a minute, conversation about all the components of this global threat. One can not save the planet to one country. But it is possible and necessary to find a diplomatic solution for each conflict situation, if all countries support it. That is, the ways are known. It is necessary to break the problem into components, not forgetting the main goal, and systematically go ahead. At the same time, all states recognized or not should participate in the process. No one has the right to ignore the universal human activity to preserve the native planet.

Conclusion

Let's sum up. The problem of preserving peace is global. It concerns every inhabitant of the Earth. Its aspects are versatile. It affects the economic, social aspects of the existence of mankind. This problem has no limits. Nobody can hide. However, it is completely solvable. But in the process all countries and nations must participate. Although there is no need to talk about theory. In practice, this is what happens. This we see in the news. In Minsk, the members of the Normandy Four agree, in Vienna the six sign an agreement with Iran and so on. All these are events of the same series. Namely, the efforts of world players in the peaceful resolution of conflict situations. Let's hope that in this way the situation will develop further.