Property as an economic category

Property as an economic category reflects the entire complex of social relations: social, national, religious, political, legal, moral and ethical, and others. This is a rather complex and multifaceted notion. Property is at the center of the economic system, since it determines how the employee will be connected to the means of production, determines the structure of society, both political and social. It also affects the presence and nature of motivation for work, the choice of how to divide its results.

Thus, expressing the deepest interrelations and interdependencies, ownership as an economic category reveals the essence of society's being.

At first it was viewed as a relation of a person to a certain thing, that is, whether he had it available and whether it could be disposed of. Then, as society developed, scientific knowledge accumulated, the idea of ownership became more substantial and voluminous. Things began to be understood differently. Only under certain economic conditions did silver and gold turn into money. After all, in themselves, they are not.

The same applies to property. It is characterized primarily not by the relationship of a person to a thing, but by who and by what means it is appropriated. It is also important to what extent the interests of the others are affected. Once they enter into a relationship about the appropriation of a thing, it becomes property. And this is an economic category.

Assignment is a concrete way of mastering a thing existing in society. It expresses the subject's relation to her as a personal one.

Assignment begins with the sphere of production. It is here that the object of property is formed, its value. Who owns the means of production, he gets results. Further through the spheres of exchange and distribution this process continues.

Hence the following definition follows. Property as an economic category is a complex of relationships between business entities. Together, they decide on the appropriation of the results of production and its means.

There is also the opposite process - alienation. It takes place when the subject remains without the rights to own and dispose of an object of ownership. Both processes are diametrically opposite sides of one concept. Contradictions in the system of "appropriation-alienation" serves as a strong internal impetus for the self-development of property relations. This is precisely the powerful influence of this connection.

Property as an economic category perceives the appearance of how a person relates to a thing. Therefore, it necessarily reflects the relationship: the relation of its "master" to "not the master." This interdependence is manifested through its subjects and objects.

As the latter, everything that can be appropriated: real estate, natural resources, money, securities, means of production, etc.

Bearers of relations are subjects of ownership. These are individuals or legal entities, state or several states.

Property as an economic category is closely interrelated with the legal side of life. The legal aspect is fixed in the legislation. This gives the economic relations the character of legal, that is, their participants become carriers of certain obligations and opportunities.

Another of the most intractable problems in the economy, arising from the consideration of property, is the classification of its types. It is carried out on the basis of two approaches: horizontal-structural and vertical-historical. The latter determines those types of property in the economy that have developed historically.

A horizontal-structural approach takes into account, first of all, the level of development of productive forces, the degree of the subject's rights to resources, to the management of production, to its results, etc. Based on these criteria, they distinguish private and public property, each of them has its own forms Manifestations.