Which browser is the least likely to load the system: rating, review and reviews

Since the advent of the World Wide Web, called the Internet, surfing tools have begun to develop at a frantic pace. Web browsers are used as the main tool. But not all of them are equivalent in terms of their capabilities and the load that can be exerted on the system. Let's try to figure out which browser is the least likely to load the system, taking into account the main technical characteristics and reviews of ordinary users.

What is the load on the system?

To understand the meaning of the load, you should directly examine the currently downloaded content that is contained on a particular web resource. It is clear after all that if a site is a resource on which only the text is presented, then there is nothing to talk about. The system reads the text in any encoding and does not strain much.

The question of which browser least loads the system, should be considered in terms of multimedia content or development tools provided by the browsers themselves.

If we talk about multimedia, we should immediately take into account that the processing facilities provided by browsers by default in the main versions of programs are often supplemented by a sufficiently large number of special plug-ins. Take at least the same Adobe Flash Player, responsible for the quality reproduction of animation, graphics and sound.

Thus, the issue will be relevant not so much about which browser eats least of all resources, but about how resource-intensive is the additional plug-in, because the browser itself in its pure form may not work with some elements of web pages.

Basic performance parameters

If you consider the main characteristics of the most famous and most commonly used surfing tools on the Internet, the first place for any user or expert-tester is the speed of launching the program itself from the executable and the speed of opening pages.

Unfortunately, many users trying to figure out which browser is less likely to load the processor or RAM, often pass by the start parameters of the application. So to say, in its pure form after the installation, they all start quickly enough. This is due only to the fact that there are no plug-ins in them, the cache is not full, there is no history of visits, etc.

Over time, any, even the most sophisticated browser with a bunch of lotions turns into a clumsy uvelnya. What's most sad, even cleaning the cache or deleting temporary files does not help. And if you take into account also the initialization of plug-ins when starting the program, in general, it is worthwhile to think about the expediency of installing them.

Some applications have their own set, which can not be deleted, but you can disable it. For example, Chrome comes with built-in components like Adobe Flash Player or AdBlock. If everything is clear with the first plug-in, the second one sometimes causes legitimate censures. It is responsible for blocking advertisements, pop-ups and banners, and can also prevent the activation of some automatically executed scripts and applets embedded in web pages. And all this takes a lot of time.

Opening pages with preliminary content analysis directly depends on the content. Any modern browser spends a fraction of a second on this. Again, it all depends on the plugins - the more of them, the slower the program works. And incorrectly installed or incompatible additions slow down the system even more.

Which browsers use less memory?

But let's start checking the very means of access to the Internet. Here you should take into account the consumption of operational, virtual and physical memory. If you understand the question of which browser is the least likely to load the system, you should pay attention to the basic default settings and the size of the cache allocated.

Cached data, although it allows to increase the speed of opening the most frequently visited pages by saving some elements on the hard drive, nevertheless can too much clog the system and cause the effects of program hang. This is due to the constant analysis of the loadable constructive elements of the pages. With a sufficiently large number of them, more time is required for analysis and loading.

In this regard, the best indicators, judging by the feedback of users and experts, show Internet Explorer 11, Edge from Windows 10, Mozilla and Google Chrome. Opera, although it is a very popular means of access to the Internet, works much more slowly. In addition, today versions of the program in unofficial sources can be found so much that you do not always know whether this product is safe.

Best browsers: rating and reviews

If we consider modern browsers, we can make a list, in which, as expected, there are only programs of the most famous developers:

• Internet Explorer;
• Edge;
• Opera;
• Mozilla Firefox;
• Chrome.

You could add here some programs like Amigo, Yandex Browser, 360 Safety Browser or something else. But they are not specifically included in the list, because they are built on the basis of Chrome and as truncated or extended derivatives of the main product of interest do not represent. Often in them because of the unfinished technologies and algorithms of problems there is much more than in the parent product. This is clearly evidenced by unflattering statements by users.

Now, on the question of which browser is the least likely to load the system, let us dwell in somewhat more detail.

Internet Explorer

To IE, which is a part of any Windows operating system, users had an extremely negative attitude, because the earlier versions of the program were so unfinished that it was not even necessary to talk about some convenience of working on the Internet.

Over time, developers from Microsoft have revised the main concept of the browser, resulting in the appearance of the 11th version of the application. Whoever that said, and Internet Explorer 11 in all respects spits and "Mozilla", and "Chrome", and even more "Opera". The load is minimal, the start is much faster than similar applications, cleaning the cache and temporary files does not require user intervention, as it was before (you had to manually clean the Temporary Files folders).

Edge

The same Internet Explorer became the progenitor of a new generation browser called Edge, which appeared only in Windows 10 (for systems with a lower rank the version is not provided).

This application rightfully occupies the top lines in all ratings. Most background processes when the program is started are automated, starting is performed within a couple of seconds, opening pages without even installing the accompanying plugins is very fast. By the way, you do not need to install add-ons - everything is included in the package.

Another thing is that this browser is somewhat inconvenient to configure, especially in terms of disabling extensions. And a little strains the start page by default (news, weather, advertising, etc.). But all this can be turned off if you put a dummy on startup by the way it's done in IE.

Opera

The notorious "Opera", although it is the most revered, has recently passed in positions. Despite the convenient and fairly simple interface, performance is poor.

Even at startup, you can notice a too long access to the hard disk, as well as when the cache is completely cleared and temporary files are deleted. However, in pluses you can record the ability to quickly configure, disable or delete extensions. But this in no way can affect the overall assessment.

Mozilla Firefox

The search for an answer to the question of which browser is the least likely to load the system can not do without this browser.

Easy and fast - that's what you can say about it. However, not all users evaluate it to the fullest. The fact is that "Fire Fox" as the most primitive means of access to the Internet can not be considered. This browser is more suitable for web developers and can be used as a full platform for creating web applications. The toolkit here is much wider than all that other favorites of the list offer.

Chrome and browsers based on it

Chrome is considered the fastest of all existing browsers. Developments based on it are characterized by speed only after the first installation, and eventually start to brake incredibly.

And the speed of launching, and the speed of opening pages, and the ease of configuration or management - at altitude. Plus - the largest number of plugins and extensions developed. The question is different. Should I install them? This is already everyone decides for himself. Nevertheless, on all major indicators in the popularity lists, this browser is not inferior to Edge.

What to choose?

So, choose the easiest browser. Of course, preference (based on feedback from users) could be given to Microsoft products, but it is believed that the most optimal option will be installing Chrome.

And here in favor of the choice is not only technical characteristics or performance parameters with minimal load on the system. If you look more broadly, you can see that the latest version of the application supports RDP (Remote Desktop) technology and can be used as the main client for connecting to computers and laptops, even from mobile devices.

Thus, the scales in the question of which browser is the least likely to load the system, is the easiest to manage and configure, clearly leaning in favor of "Chrome", although this estimate is based solely on ratings, no more.