On the Victory of Putin

Two-thirds of the votes and Putin's convincing victory in the first round of the presidential elections stunned the opposition and demoralized the thinking part of society, I am sure even those who called for voting for the current prime minister, while not frost-bitten adepts of the theory of the forthcoming flowering of the Eurasian civilization and the concept of Moscow - the third And the last Rome. I do not think that Tarasova, Fridlich, Khamatova, Khazanov are eager for the transformation of Russia into Belarus, or Venezuela with North Korea and Iran, they are mentally closer to America and Great Britain. And now, absolutely boorish, impudent and unceremonious multi-pass fraud with erecting a candidate for the throne who has grown disgusted even by his own nominal supporters is completed with a special degree of cynicism - a percentage of support is provided that exceeds even the predicted forecasts of court sociological services. A new edition of Brezhnev's Mesozoic was not realized anywhere among African tribes, but in his native country, which we are accustomed to consider part of modern civilization.

The first emotional reaction of the man in the street - the opponent of the regime - was the claims to the leaders of the opposition. The information space of the post - election day did not contain a discussion of the illegitimacy of Putin's election. Delights of pro-Kremlin political scientists, bloggers and other bought and sincere supporters have occupied the network and television, creating a persistent sense of total hopelessness and the end of the world. And yet, as it turned out, the tears of the touch of GDP were what to oppose.

Over the next couple of days, from various, quite authoritative sources, information about the extent of fraud was brought to the mass audience. Latynina, Navalny, Lazarev, Milov, and other activists, who are not considered demyszy and marginal in the popular consciousness, told the public about the technique of throwing in and roundabouts, dopgulation and buses with absentee ballots, with convincing photo reports and videos. The question remained, however, if the technologies of "victory" were clear, predictable and obvious, why protest actions in the media sphere were not prepared in advance, why the progressive electorate, exhausted by the 12-year-old board of the Ozer co-operative, remained 4-5
March alone with the bacchanalia of Putin's sympathizers? Still, opposition leaders should take care of the moral comfort of their supporters, not many
Have a psyche so strong that they can contemplate the jubilation of Babkina, Rastorguev, Govorukhin and other admirers of Putin's charisma without loss of health.

I do not agree with the defeatists who call not to go to the rally of the 10th, so as not to hear again the annoying speeches about the prison prospects of the organizers of the electoral victories of the regime. The slogans must reach the mass consciousness and materialize, the usurpation of power must be punished in accordance with the norms of criminal law. To be sure of fraud and feel shy about listening and speaking about this - this position is incomprehensible, if it is not, of course, paid with dignity from taxpayers-banderlogists.

Bulk - listen to Svanidze, Radzikhovsky, and, God forgive, Kandelaki, and do the opposite. The truth is for you, call the people for disobedience actions, hammer all the Internet with rollers with throws in, flood all lawsuits with claims, bring to everyone the idea of an impostor Lzhevladimir. This is what tens of millions of voters Zyuganov and Prokhorov are now waiting for, spoiled by machinists, who feel themselves to be strangers in their country.

And, at last, a few bright impressions from the election race. Brutal trainer Zapashny, the winner of boxing "dances with the stars", turned out to be a tender and vulnerable being, having experienced discomfort from persecution because of public support for the candidate of power. Such a degree of moral deafness drives into a stupor. Have such sufferers heard about companies against Nemtsov, Podrabinek, Shenderovich, Kasparov and others, who are regularly watered at the expense of taxpayers' funds?

I am sure that the budgets of these companies exceed the amounts allocated to the benefactor Khamatova from royal hands. But the polar metamorphosis. The intelligent artist Mironov suddenly turned out to be a hawk in the defense of Putin's honor and dignity , urging him to deal with Navalny immediately after the elections. We have already dealt with Politkovskaya, Litvinenko and Shchekochikhin, we have a little work with Yushchenko, everything is not enough for the bloodthirsty Eugene, we should still let the Yushka on the altar of Putin's victory.

Artisan of the middle hand Govorukhin, the diligent screener of knick-knacks by Agatha Christie and the Vainer brothers, in the role of obscurantism, defamatory Internet technology - it's just a gift, a hundred percent hit, a long-playing trump card of the opposition. The delirium of the director who survives from the mind and talent should be broadcast again and again, preferably in a cutting with Putin's statements about the bandergists. It is necessary to hire one more Putin's admirer, DJ Groove, and order a track like "There is happiness, it can not be," with Govorukhin-Putin recitative.
Each user should take these words to his account and vote as necessary on the
The next elections, which I am sure will happen earlier than in 6 years.

Pugacheva, quite unexpectedly supported Prokhorov and challenged Zhirinovsky. Such Alla Borisovna, we have not seen since the scandal in the hotel Leningradskaya. Unfortunately, the singer was ashamed to broadcast a phraseological set spent on the modest administrator in 87th - this time the object for the abuse was much more worthy. But I have not considered Pugachev a nonconformist for a long time, so thank you on this.

Bozena Rynska, immensely respected (without jokes), and her companion, who heeded the advice of Tatyana Tolstaya, the same dear friend (without jokes), and left the country for post-election days in order to protect the inspirer of the revolution from fur coats from her own uncontrollable temperament. The council was given a little bit on another occasion, but on the whole it was quite consistent with the moment. We will consider this as the reconciliation of worthy ladies against the background of such dramatic events? I would like to.