Publications and Writing ArticlesPoetry

Mayakovsky. Analysis "And could you?" - the statement of his question or the expectation of our answer?

There is a question in the title. To better understand the poem "And you could?" (Mayakovsky), the analysis must begin with this question. At the same time, it is rhetorical and quite direct, suggesting an answer. Although, on the one hand, a certain judgment is reflected about the general mass of people, which, based on his experience, has Mayakovsky.

The analysis "And could you?" (Poem) shows that the author really asks his readers and listeners, as he, including, gave many live performances. The potential answer of these people would be "no." Of course, in fact no one would have sounded it, because people simply would not have entered into a dialogue with him, limited by the mundane nature of his thinking. On the other hand, he does not go into the description of someone else's sinfulness and mediocrity, does not point at anyone, because he does not seek personal satisfaction in this. Being full of energy and creative power, he regrets others. His goal - not to blame, but to shake. His peculiar crying is like a friendly hand, which maybe no one will shake, or as a challenge to the enemy standing on a hill on the other side of the plain where everyone is asleep. Here the reader is invited to compare one and the other, and to answer the question posed by Mayakovsky himself, "But could you?". An analysis of the poem makes it clear that in reality this is a question of who you are, mediocrity or not. Therefore, this phrase precedes the poem, and at the end hangs in a ringing silence.

Images-objects and images-actions

The means to which Mayakovsky resorts can be conditionally described as images-objects and images-actions. You can even say in another way - he does not resort to them, but they themselves pour out of it with bitter syrup. Images-objects symbolize the components of the material world and circumstances, and the images-actions-the manipulations that Mayakovsky implements toward them. The analysis "And could you?" (One of the most famous creations) suggests that if the epithet is an addition to a word that saturates it, gives weight and a new meaning, then the actions that the author performs are epithets to objects over which It is produced.

Interaction with the outside world

The first two lines reflect the thoroughness and uncompromising approach of the author to life. He does not take the environment as something in itself directive, but instead manages it. Also, it does not defile the attributes of everyday existence, but, on the contrary, makes them play with deep colors. Thus, he says that our inner picture of the world depends only on our perception and interpretation, and that it can mutually influence the state of things.

More than a still life

The juiciness, expressiveness of the text gives rise to association with the still-life. At the same time, in the poem "Would you?" (Mayakovsky), an analysis of the qualitative composition of sentences suggests that it is not just a still life. Although it is necessary to pay tribute to Mayakovsky as an artist of the word. Virtually all words in the text are represented by verbs and nouns (or pronouns). And the few adjectives that occur ("slanting", "tinny", "new", "rainwater"), have a very specific physical, non-emotional significance. Removed from the context, they will hardly noticeably change the expression of the poem. Verbs "showed", "read", "played", "could" also initially colorless. Of the most common words Mayakovsky weaves something completely new and enthralling. Every word here is said essentially.

The difference between "could" and "could"

All the emphasis is on action. "Lubricate the map of everyday life," "splashing paint from a glass" - it means not to give yourself up to the mercy of fate, and at the same time to color it. "Show on a platter of jelly oblique cheekbones of the ocean" - can be interpreted as the opening of potential and prospects. So is the question posed by Vladimir Mayakovsky ("Would you?") Be a primitive provocation. An analysis of the subsequent text indicates that he condemns not only the earthiness of thinking, but also its excessive volatility, carelessness. In everything that surrounds us, we do not need to search for poetics and start out in lengthy discourse. We need to create, act, transform, take everything under our control - and right now, as Mayakovsky himself does. The analysis "And could you?" Shows that this is not just a challenge. Compare, for example, two forms of the verb - "could" and "could". The first variant, which is used in the poem, has a more interrogative meaning, the significance of the action, which continues always and everywhere. While the second option is just an incentive to prove something to someone.

The images, natural and at the same time original, created by Mayakovsky, have an almost tangible power and vigor. Analysis "And you could?" Shows that not only the meaning of words contributes to this, but also the very sound of them. At the same time, the general picture does not lose its ease, the author's readiness for soft and fresh impressions, for their expectation, whose symbol is the lips, is shown. You can notice the ironic and flying tinge of the narrative, which in the last line is compared with the nocturne. "I have already played my nocturne and will play again, but what about you?".

Similar articles

 

 

 

 

Trending Now

 

 

 

 

Newest

Copyright © 2018 en.birmiss.com. Theme powered by WordPress.