Life principles Chatsky and Molchalin. Characteristics of Molchalin and Chatsky

Ten years from now, there will be two centuries, as on the theatrical scenes the comedy "Woe from Wit" comes along with unchanged success. Among the brilliant characters, which depicted in his work Griboedov - Chatsky and Molchalin. It is they who are dedicated to our article.

The classic of Russian literature of the early 19th century was an extraordinary personality: a brilliant diplomat "standing 20 thousand army", one of the most educated people of his time. The spectator is fascinated by the model of aristocratic Moscow society of the average hand created by the playwright. The characters of the Griboedov comedy are bright and relevant.

In particular, the life principles of Chatsky and Molchalin, two young people of 23 and 24 years of age, starting their social life in Russian society, are conceptual. The principles of the first are reduced to the destruction of the foundations of serfdom. The second is obsessed with an effective career inside a stable state.

Comparison of the social statuses of Chatsky and Molchalin

The nature of social activity of people is to a certain extent determined by their social status. The origin of Alexander Andreevich Chatsky and Alexei Stepanovich Molchalin is different. Chatsky - an aristocrat, he, not being in the service, has a steady source of income. And not only provides "daily bread", but also allows you to go "to learn the mind" in Europe. The life principles of Chatsky and Molchalin are the principles of various social groups: aristocrats who despise labor and are keen on the French revolution, and raznochintsev, whose work seeks recognition.

Chatsky is ironically called "a fiery prophet"

Arriving home, aristocrat Chatsky, inspired by European progress, according to Alexander Isaevich Solzhenitsyn, positions himself with the status of a "fiery prophet" who does not even know how the declarative principles formulated in Russia can be realized in Russia.

The phrases of Chatsky bludgeon and are correct. Alexander is a utopian and egoist. His communication with other people is reduced to fiery monologues and sharp parries of opposing opinions. Alexander Isaevich noticed the communicative incompetence of this hero Griboedov, his readiness to "saber" his opponents, and unnecessarily carried away by the process.

Pushkin, speaking of Chatsky, was even more ironic - "funny little fellow."

Chatsky and Molchalin - a different attitude towards society

In contrast to his more wealthy peer, Alexei subtly feels the society in which he lives. His tact and obedience bring him social bonuses. This provincial is more than a secretary, in fact - the right hand of Famusov. He pleases the friends of his patron visiting the Famusov house.

Is Chatsky right, who branded the "two-faced", "reptilian", "mean" secretary? After all, he does not even try to understand what kind of person Alexei is. The comparative characteristic of Chatsky and Molchalin reveals two completely different personalities with different types of mind. One - bright, imaginative, ideological, the second - practical, economic. After all, in fact, Alexei Stepanovich Molchalin acts within the bounds of decency and tolerance.

In the end, they can be moved by gratitude to Famusov - his benefactor, a man who gives work and shelter. MOLCHALIN does not think about things (according to Bulgakov's professor Preobrazhensky) "cosmic scale and cosmic stupidity." He does more than he says. Moreover, the characterization of Molchalin and Chatsky shows that the former is not only loyal to society, but is also his useful cog. The second should be attributed to a cohort of extra people in their homeland, following Evgeny Onegin and Pechorin. He, following the logic of the author of the work, positions himself as the only "smart man" among "fools".

The life principles of Chatsky and Molchalin are incommensurable. The ideas of the first are divorced from Russian life, they are just general slogans. Before their implementation, life is an abyss.

Is Molchanin "so crafty"?

Alexei Molchalin, unlike his opponent, really earns a living by service. His life rules are tested in practice. He, working as a secretary, lives in the house of his patron Pavel Afanasevich Famusov, actually carrying out all the office work of the manager of the official place for him. In other words, Molchalin is a clerk and an accountant. He cherishes his place of work. So is it worth blaming him for "moderation and accuracy"?

In addition, young people are united by a love conflict. Chatsky likes the daughter of Famusov, Sophia; And she, in turn, sympathizes with Alexei Khlestakov. The life principles of Chatsky and Molchalin are different, including in relations with the opposite sex. Thus, Chatsky, who thinks himself ideal, has no idea about the reasons that have cooled the girl's feelings for him.

Molchalin - "alive", an erring character

MOLCHALIN does not find the courage to admit Sophia at once that he does not love her. At the same time, he is delicate in communicating with her and does not compromise the girl. Griboedov in the image of Molchalin shows a careerist who does not have the noble title, however, pragmatic. Step by step he follows to achieve a favorable position in society. The Molchalins are not fond of ideas and criticism. Their element - daily hard work.

Griboyedov brings these two characters into a worldview conflict: Chatsky and Molchalin. After all, they, young people, in the opinion of the author, will determine the face of the "coming age". However, the reader understands: Secretary Famusov is not at all such a prudent monster, as Chatsky puts it. Moreover, Alexei is really confused - on the one hand, desiring a relationship with Liza, whom he loves, and on the other - trying to be kind to his master's daughter. Accidentally, Sophia hears his confession to the servant. Chatsky likes this.

Career Molchalin destroys "lordly love"

The situation is not in favor of Molchalin. Most likely, he will lose the job of the secretary of a state institution. However, he did not do anything reprehensible, on a large scale. The reaction of Sophia to the heard confession can be called a "storm in a glass of water." She liked Alex, and she fantasized herself that he loved her. The daughter of Famusov presented the discrepancy of the imagination of reality as Molchalin's meanness. Chatsky also openly gloats.

However, he understands perfectly well that his position in the Famusovs' house is rather shaky. Therefore, the wise phrase, spoken by Lisa, about the disastrous consequences for a man of a simple estate as "lordly anger", and "lordly love" - directly touches him. It is "lordly love" that causes the future collapse of his career as an employee. Comparative characteristics Chatsky and Molchalin, thus, shows that it is the second characteristic of communicability, modesty, self-discipline, will.

Obviously, these features also aroused sympathy for Sophia.

Instead of concluding

Chatsky and Molchalin have a different type of thinking. Alexander Andreevich very temperamentally expresses his thoughts, he vividly justifies the chosen position, immediately criticizes opponents and does nothing, and then leaves with an offended air. It is worth remembering that the amateurs of Russian literature have already met a stormy and barren stream of thoughts from one character. This is all we know, Ilya Ilyich Oblomov.

Of course, Chatsky is a more dynamic character. However, he had already made the first step along the path of Ilya Ilyich-he neglected his work. It's not for nothing that Alexei Molchalin spends it on this.

At the same time, the characterization of Molchalin and Chatsky, given by the author in the work, gives grounds for departing from the classical characteristic. And it is right. After Chatsky - not so positive, and Molchalin in actual fact - not a potential villain.