How does Article 119 of the Criminal Code help prevent a death threat?

In a conflict situation, when one person threatens another cruel reprisal, you can not give up and go on about the abuser. Impunity often breeds new aggression. In such cases, Article 119 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation will help. You just need to turn to law enforcement and draw your opponent to justice.

In search of a solution

Situations in which Article 119 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation is applied are due to misunderstandings caused by the clarification of relations. Most often, disputes arise between native people or those who are fairly familiar with each other. Usually these are domestic conflicts, but there may be personal disagreements. In such a situation, there comes a time when insults and fights do not bring the desired effect. In this case, one of the parties chooses the tactics of intimidation. She tries to solve the matter in her own favor, threatening her with death or serious bodily harm.

Article 119 of the Criminal Code will punish such an aggressor. What usually counts the raging hooligan? Of course, he is trying to psychologically influence the victim. What does a person feel after the threat he expressed? Naturally, fear and fear for your life. It is these emotions that make the main emphasis. Tyrant tries to morally suppress the identity of the enemy. If he succeeds, then the goal is achieved. Otherwise, repeated threats may follow. You can resist such an effect only by using the law as a defense. Article 119 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation is what is needed. All you need to do is write a statement. The rest of justice takes care of itself.

Punishment of the guilty

Not every threat contains a sufficient degree of danger. Sometimes people casually throw words, not giving them proper value. If the danger does exist, then only Article 119 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation will help it. Punishment, which according to it is provided (for part 1), will force the offender to reflect on their actions and draw the appropriate conclusions.

Under the law, the offender is to choose (depending on the circumstances): compulsory work for a period of 4 to 80 hours, arrest up to 6 months, as well as forced labor, restriction or full imprisonment for a period of not more than 2 years. Such a punishment can not be called too harsh. This is more like an educational moment. The main goal is to convey to the offender that aggressive actions against another person are unacceptable. In addition, no one has the right to threaten a person, and any encroachment on his life and health will be stopped in every possible way.

Reasonable threat

Sometimes it is very difficult for the victim to prove that the threat of life was really present in the offender's words. Article 119 of the Criminal Code can be applied only in case of real fears. The situation can develop in two ways. It all depends on the seriousness of the intentions. For example, one of the residents of a communal apartment constantly forgets to turn off the light in the bathroom. The neighbor repeatedly makes a comment to him, but this does not bring any result. At one point he does not hold back and promises to kill if such actions are repeated. Now another situation. A citizen periodically beats his wife. She is always silent. But there comes a time when the woman decides to answer him and promises to seek help from the police. The enraged husband grabs a knife from the table and threatens to kill if she fulfills her promise.

In what situation is the threat real? Of course, in the second. Here intentions are confirmed by physical actions. In addition, it is not bad if the applicant will have witnesses. With their participation, the appeal will be more convincing.

Mindful intentions

The cause of the threat can be much more serious than just a family disassembly or misunderstanding between neighbors. This is stated in part 2 of this article. The question may concern ideological, political, national, as well as religious or racial hostility. Such clashes threaten the society with great unrest. And if the case concerns a particular social group, then the outcome of the case will be difficult to predict. These issues are also raised by Article 119 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. The term, which is provided for as punishment, is more severe and categorical.

In accordance with this article, the perpetrator may be deprived of his liberty. And the runaway here is already two to five years. In parallel, he may be prohibited from engaging in a particular type of activity or performing certain work corresponding to his official duties. This item appeared not so long ago. It was introduced in July 2007 by specially issued law No. 211-FZ. This is done after it was decided to allocate such violations in a separate article. Now they began to be equated with violations against the individual.