LawCriminal law

From Shinkin. Corruption In the Republic of Uzbekistan, Uncontrolled Legal Entities, Violation of Human Rights.

Chairman of the Committee on Legislation and Judicial and Legal Issues of the Senate of the Oliy Majlis of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Artikova

From a citizen of the Republic of Uzbekistan

Shkinin Vladimir Ivanovich 1957 b.

Residing. Tashkent, Mirabad district

Hospital block No. 7 is apartment 58.

Ph. 9034125.

W O R E N D E F E

Dear Svetlana Baymirzaevna. In connection with the application of the Office of the Public Prosecutor of the Mirabad district of Tashkent against me and my family members, through the deputy head of the SB of the Mirabad police department, MI Egamberdiev. (Later detained by the National Security Service on September 17, 2011 with red-handed when taking a bribe) and the criminal judge of the Mirabad district of Ermatov B., the anti-constitutional prosecution with the use of illegal repressive measures infringing on human rights, I have to turn to you. Our previous appeals to state bodies in accordance with the procedure established by law provoked a backlash, which increased the repressive effect against us, organized by the Mirabad district prosecutor's office, which expressed the existence of its interests in the TCHSZH system of the Hospital hospital.

The reason for the repressive impact is the opposition I rendered against the corrupt grouping of the chairman of the Akhlony mahalla on the hospital hospital Gulbakhor Mukimovna Khasanova, who organized, with the participation of the then executive director of the condominium association, Mirsagatova Ibragim Akharovich, major embezzlement in the AO Avloniy TSZH. Catching up the traces of these crimes, Khasanova split this cost-effective condominium business into small TSZHSH, continuing through them to realize the interests of her corrupt group, the counteraction of which served as the following circumstances:

Theft in the HOA of A.Avloniy in the amount of more than 7 million soums by the chief accountant of the HOA Saydalieva with the connivance of the HOA executive director Juraeva PB, the chairman of the board of the HOA Karimov M.S. And the secretary of the board of the HOA Salimova RN. To prevent theft and abuse, on the initiative of the residents of the hospital hospital, I was elected deputy chairman of the board of the HOA. In which I expressed a protest at the meeting of the board of the HOA for the demand in the statement of the secretary of the board of the HOA Salimova RN. From 04.01.2005. Pay off due to bona fide payers of the HOA her long-term debts for maintenance services.

Regardless of my aspirations to the Board of the HOA, ignoring the Law "On Homeowners Association-1999", and later the Law "On TCHSZH-2006." Khasanova, sponsored by the khokimiyat of Mirabad district, organized another large theft more than 30 million soums, Transfer of the press TSG with the right of the chairman of the board of the HOUSING HOUSE to sign financial and bank documents to the director of the HOA Mirsagatov IA Compiled by Khasanova on behalf of the mahalla kengash Avlony fake protocol No. 1 of 07.01.2005, by which she simultaneously foresaw the subsequent destruction of the traces of crimes by the method of splitting the cost-effective condominium to small HOAH-TSHL.

In connection with the introduction of Khasanova in the context of the Law on TCHSZH for the posts of heads of single-person TCHSZH of the people devoted to her, I tried to lend her unscrupulous heads of TCHSZH "Mazhnuntol communal service" Khankishieva R., Ruziev A.K. And Konovalova OM. Counteraction to their abuse and theft. To all, being an eyewitness of the installation of a resident of the house number 37 Rakhimov AA. By own strength of the barrier on the driveway of the house number 37, I confirmed this fact, inadvertently entering this in the next confrontation with Khasanova, who signed and assured stamped mahallya stamped act of 18.11.2008g. About the manufacture of this device by Salimova R. due to the repayment of the operating costs for the apartment of the manufacturer of these devices by some Arkhangelskaya VN, whom I did not see in the manufacture of this device. Being summoned to the SB Mirabad district police department Egamberdiev for questioning me as a witness in the criminal case No. 27 / 09-150, I explained in detail and laid down in writing about the illegal actions of Khasanova and her proteges. Later, Egamberdiev warned me to stop adhering to my initial testimony, otherwise I and my family members will have serious problems.

Due to the fact that I did not listen to Egamberdiev's warnings, I was excluded from the number of witnesses in criminal case No. 27 / 09-150 and was not invited to a hearing in the criminal court of the Mirabad district. However, I attended the trial, expressing my surprise at the false testimony of Khasanova and Salimova. I was also amazed by the discovery during the judicial investigation of new circumstances about the reasons for the dismissal of Konovalova OM. From the Department of Internal Affairs of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Uzbekistan, based on the results of the official investigation conducted by the defendant herself A.A. Rakhimov. The conclusion of which she was forbidden to occupy materially responsible posts in the system of GUIN of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Uzbekistan. For this reason, for reasons I did not understand, the court did not respond properly and did not send a request In GUIN of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Uzbekistan. For confirmation or refutation of the fact announced in the courtroom of this fact.

In order to prevent my testimony, which most likely could have influenced the judicial verdict or the consequent consequence in favor of achieving the truth, Egamberdiev's warnings began to be carried out in the following sequence:

On Sunday, 03/04/2011. About 06 am, under the guise of checking the passport regime, in the apartment of my daughter-in-law Galiaskarova-Zadorenko SI. At the address of Tashkent Mirabad district, Fargona yuli street, 2-lane house 119/33 sq. 3 broke into the presence of the district inspector of the OPS of Mirabad district, the captain of militia Korakulov Bakhtiyor K. a group of unidentified employees of the Mirabad district police department who kept their positions and surnames secret. In this apartment temporarily lived friends of my daughter-in-law. Militia employees without authorization entered a private home and searched the apartment. They seized the private library of the deceased father of the daughter-in-law, which consisted of artistic and religious books of official publications, and also took three rare bibles of old periodicals out of the protocol, since her father professionally studied theology and attended the legal church of Christ in Tashkent. In the seizure protocol, in addition to Korakulov, there is a signature of M.M. Normabhammedov, the officer in charge of the Mirabad police department of the Mirabad police department, who was present, and for his secrecy, with the contents of this protocol, we were able to get acquainted only after more than a month after receiving the decision of the Mirabad District Court for Criminal Cases of 04.04. 2011.

On the same day, about 17:00 my daughter-in-law Galiaskarova-Zadorenko was detained and taken to Mirabad police department, where, on the pretext of finding out the origin of her books, she was interrogated about my son Shinkin VV, trying to find out whether he smokes anasha, Drugs, kind of his occupation? That is, in fact, they tried to collect information compromising my son.

Then, on the same day, 03.04.2011. At 22 o'clock, under the pretext of the need to examine only personal belongings temporarily residing with my son Shinkin VI. My daughter-in-law Galiaskarova-Zadorenko in a house at the address of Tashkent Khamzinsky district 1-travel Marv house 1 where my son Shinkin VV lived, arrived without a sanction to invade a private home for a search, a group of workers of the Mirabad police department and the Central Internal Affairs Directorate Tashkent in the number of 6-7 people. Observing the secrecy, the police department and the Central Internal Affairs Directorate refused to give their names and posts, referring to Captain Hyazhanova IE, who stood in the side of the hamened district inspector of the Khamzin police department, who was going on the side. Promising only to inspect the personal belongings of my daughter-in-law, the workers who entered the house actually searched the house , Down to the underwear of women. The oldest of them was Timur 30-35 years old, thin, above average height. Most of all, Aziz was shouting and threatening for 35 years, lean, red-cheeked. During a conversation on the mobile phone, Aziz was introduced as an employee of the 5th department of the Central Internal Affairs Directorate. In the bookcase there was a children's Bible with color illustrations, the story of Jesus Christ, children's fairy tales, religious booklets of official publications, children's drawing books, children's novels, a book about psychological depression, art books, etc., purchased in free retail trade in book Shops and in the functioning Christian church. After Timur said: "That's enough!", They made a props, throwing in one heap art books, and on top put the children's Bible, the story of Jesus Christ and completely clean DVD discs, which they began to photograph, and then they seized it all by protocol . During the search, police officers behaved rudely, threatened with the institution of criminal proceedings, humiliated my human dignity and my family. About his actions, one of the militiamen present, stepping aside, reported in detail on his mobile phone to his supervisor: "There is nothing in the house". To my appeal to the district inspector Khiyazhanov with the question: "Why do they take away children's literature?", He told me: "I do not know why they need it?" Here, at Timur's request, my son Shinkin V.V. Gave a written explanation about the origin of books that were the property of his bride and her daughter.

04.04.2011. In the Mirabad police department as a result of threats of arrest and deceit by the promise of immediate release, Shinkin V.V. And Galiaskarova-Zadorenko was forced to sign protocols of an administrative offense without specifying the type and articles of the offense. Here, under the pressure of the workers of the Mirabad district police department, the district inspector of the FSB of the Khamzin district police department, Khiyazhanov I.E. Was forced to write a dictation backdating 03.04.2011. Report to the name of the acting head of the Khamzin police department Lieutenant Colonel Abdullaev DN That on the basis of information received by him at the place of residence of my son Shinkin V.V. To keep forbidden religious literature, which is seized. After writing this false report of the unregistered office of the Khamzin police department and the resolution of the acting head, Abdullaev DN, Or his deputy, sincerely experienced Heyyahanov complained in the corridor of Mirabad district police department to my son Shinkin V.V. To make him falsify the document of the workers of the Mirabad police department and asked him to give him a sedative pill or a cigarette. A similar report backdating, without registration of the office and the resolution of the head of the Mirabad district police department, wrote the district inspector of the OPS of the Mirabad police department Korakulov BK.

Galiaskarova-Zadorenko based on the forged documents in the Mirabad police department, contained in this department of internal affairs from 17 hours 03.04.2011. Up to 20 hours on 04.04.2011, after which they were brought to the court for criminal cases of the Mirabad district. To my horror, without going into the essence of what happened, Judge Ermatov B. admitted the knowingly innocent Shinkin Vyacheslav Vladimirovich and Galiaskarova Snezhana Igorevna (Zadorenko) guilty of the following offenses they committed:

According to art.184-3 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Republic of Uzbekistan, that is, in the manufacture, storage or dissemination of materials propagating national, racial, ethnic or religious enmity.

- under art. 2 part 2 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Republic of Uzbekistan, that is, violation of the rules for holding religious assemblies, street processions and other ceremonies of worship. - on st.202 KAAO RUz., That is, providing participants with unauthorized meetings, rallies, street processions and demonstrations of premises or other property (communication equipment, copying and other equipment, equipment, transportation) or creating other conditions for such events (Disposition in Edition of the Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan dated 28.12.2005 No. ZRU-18).

- under art.240 Part 1 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Republic of Uzbekistan, that is, the implementation of illegal religious activities, the evasion of the leaders of religious organizations from registering the charter, the organization and conduct of special children's and youth meetings by the ministers and members of religious organizations, as well as labor, literary and other circles And groups that are not related to the worship.

According to article 241 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Republic of Uzbekistan, that is teaching of religious beliefs without special religious education and without the permission of the central body of administration of a religious organization, as well as the teaching of religious beliefs in private.

Thus, having created a specially thought-out combination with the knowledge of the Mirabad district prosecutor's office in Tashkent to organize the involvement of law-abiding citizens to account without any evidence on falsified materials in order to make me refuse to further expose the corrupt grouping of Khasanova and her patrons, Galiaskarova was fined In the amount of 497.350 soums, and Shinkin imposed a fine of 4.973.500 UZS. Moreover, Shkinkin VV, being an atheist who did not read any religious book in his life and did not participate in any religious ceremony, decided at the end of 2010. To link their destiny with the exclusively thinking about the family well-being of Galiaskarova, who never thought about religious and nationalist extremism and associated with this action, and also did not belong to any religious-nationalist organization that did not teach creeds and had never heard about religious rallies and related to These phenomena. Neighbors at the place of residence of Shinkin and Galiaskarova confirm that strangers do not visit them, no meetings were held, no meetings were held about any rallies. In the opinion of the ministers of the functioning Orthodox Church in Tashkent, representatives of jurisprudence, culture, and the media, religious literature is not prohibited among confiscated items.

Decision of Judge Ermatov B. Mirabad district court on criminal cases of Tashkent from 04.04.2011. Decided: seized books, magazines, computer disks to destroy . That is, he destroys the bibles, which are the value and primary sources of one of the largest religions of the world .

A similar prosecution was carried out by Kim Elena Vladimirovna, Romanova Natalia Leonidovna and others, whose testimony could also change the verdict of the court in criminal case No. 27 / 09-150. But in order to exclude their testimony, the Mirabad district prosecutor's office also falsified accusations of a far-fetched nature in defense of the corrupt group of the chairman of the mahalla Hasanova.

On the basis of the foregoing, I ask you, with the participation of members of your committee, to carry out a thorough check and establish an occasion for the development, under the roof of the Mirabad district prosecutor's office, of actions to conduct unauthorized entry into private dwellings. And Galiaskarova SI With a search for the purpose of falsifying materials to hold them accountable, and to carry out a thorough check and establish the cause of the premature refusal on the basis of pre-investigation verification without my participation by the Yakkasaray district prosecutor's office in instituting criminal proceedings against the detained deputy head of the SB Mirabad district police department Egamberdiev M. AND. According to the wound of the criminal case already open in the proceedings of the General Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Uzbekistan, to find the true cause of the organization of the prosecution of members of my family by the Mirabad district prosecutor's office.

Application:

1). Resolution of the Mirabad District Court on Criminal Cases in Tashkent on 04.04.2011. 2). Resolution of the Tashkent City Court on Criminal Cases of 29.04.2011. 3). The answer of the Office of Public Prosecutor of Tashkent city from 20.06.2011. 4) .Bildirgi-Report Korakulova B. addressed to the head of the Mirabad District Department of Internal Affairs Murodullaev A. 5) .Bildirgi-Report Hyazhanova I.E. To the name of the acting head of the Khamzin district police department, Abdullaev DN 6). The letter of the Committee for Religious Affairs under the Cabinet of Ministers of Uzbekistan, ref.№879 from 04.04.2011.7). The letter of the Prosecutor General's Office ref.№21 / 559-11 of 04.10.201г. 8). The letter of the Prosecutor's Office of the Yakkasaray region is ref. No. 15 / 382sh-11 of 28.11.2011. 9). The collective application is included in number 214 from 02.06.2011. To the Tashkent prosecutor and to the Yakkasaray police department from Yenileeva, Konovalova, Khasanova, Kadyrova, Salimova.

Yours faithfully Shinkin VI 18.04.2012г.

Similar articles

 

 

 

 

Trending Now

 

 

 

 

Newest

Copyright © 2018 en.birmiss.com. Theme powered by WordPress.