The main idea of the work and Chekhov's analysis of "Jumping"

Russian writer, prose writer and playwright Chekhov wrote more than 300 magnificent works for a quarter of a century of his work. These were humorous stories, novels, stories, and plays, many of which became classics of world literature. Special attention was paid to such works as "Cherry Orchard", "Chamber No. 6", "Uncle Vanya", "Duel", "Seagull", "Three Sisters" and others.

Olga Ivanovna

To any different thoughts leads any reading of his work, and even more so - in-depth analysis. Chekhov's "Poprygunya", for example, like "The Lady with the Dog", and "Dushechka", etc. - the stories he created in the 90's. In them the writer studies the character of women of modern times, their thoughts, interests, and, finally, the meaning of life. Sometimes a writer seems cruel and ruthless, he often deprives his characters of spirituality, the ability to love and compassion. And very useful, this demonstrative and peculiarly spoiled female soul analysis of Chekhov can become. "Jumping" is a work, in the very title of which the main character of the main heroine of Olga Ivanovna is determined, which Chekhov describes as a person frivolous and empty, even though she surrounds herself with people not at all simple. Each of her retinue was something remarkable, considered a celebrity or gave brilliant hopes. But in fact, the whole crowd lives an empty life devoid of any meaning. From year to year they write, sing and play the same thing, thus creating for themselves a bohemian atmosphere.

"Poprygunya": Chekhov, the analysis of the story

Initially, he called his story "The Great Man," but then he did not like it, and he corrected it on "The Bouncer." Thus, he shifted the emphasis from the hero to the heroine and this underscored the modest dignity of his hero.

The mistress of the house, Olga Ivanovna, also does a little bit of music, painting and singing, but she still remains a big dilettante in all these matters.

However, if we continue this well-known work analysis, Chekhov's "jumping" of her husband Dr. Dymov Osip Stepanovich puts the lowest of all, if not to say that he despises. She does not understand his genius and sincerity. At the very beginning the plot is built in such a way that it seems that nothing foreshadows a tragic denouement. Olga Ivanovna, being married to Dymov, surrounded herself with actors, singers, writers, musicians and artists, everyone is learning her art, she is very keen on this process and, of course, guests. A fatal handsome man, a young man Ryabovsky, became the one whom the mistress of the house herself laid eyes upon. Her husband in this company turned out to be small, strange and superfluous, although he was tall and broad in the shoulders.

Death of Dymov

You can continue to continue the analysis in the same spirit. Chekhov "jumping" reminds of the irrepressible and carefree dragonfly from Krylov's fable "Dragonfly and the Ant". It's not for nothing that he calls her that, because Olga Ivanovna, taking herself as her permanent guests, and collecting them in her home, simply did not notice the kind and selfless soul of her husband. But one day he treated a sick child from diphtheria and he himself contracted that deadly disease. When he was dying, his friends spoke of him as a very rare and remarkable man. And only then did his wife understand who she had lost.

Olga Ivanovna squandered all her love and affection for her husband-an intelligent, gentle and loving person-but someone who was used to amuse herself and change her passions like gloves and whom she quickly became deeply indifferent to.

Seeing this whole love game and accepting spiritually limited people in his house, Osip Stepanovich, by virtue of his notions about culture, does not allow himself to express any discontent, he does not even resist and just tolerates the unceremoniousness of his wife, who is ready to forgive everything. Even after learning that his wife is cheating on him, he does not dare to make any explanations, deeply hoping that this horrible drama will be resolved. But at this very moment Dymov leaves this light and Olga Ivanovna remains alone.

Style

The analysis of Chepov's "Booty-Up" very attractively shows already a fairly distinct artistic style, which he mastered perfectly by that time. The writer magnificently sarcastically over his main character, Olga Ivanovna, who worshiped empty idols and did not understand at all that her happiness was all in the clever, sensitive and kind Osip Stepanovich. A resigned, kind, silent, spineless, meek and weak creature dullly suffered its human sufferings, it lay somewhere there on its couch and did not complain. And if I complained, even in the delirium of the disease, the doctors on duty would immediately learn that the cause of such physical disorders is not only in diphtheria.

Pay

An analysis of the story of Chekhov's "Jumping" can also be understood in such a way that enlightenment comes to the heroine too late, when nothing can be changed. She suddenly realizes that it was her inattention that led the family to this tragedy. She cries and regrets much, but not her husband, first of all she is hurt for herself, for the fact that she is now left in complete impotence and loneliness. After all, Olga Ivanovna is unlikely to find such an unselfishly loving person who patiently fulfilled all her assignments and whims, not sparing all her means on them.

Very clearly Chekhov's position is expressed by one of his colleagues and friends, Dymov Korostelev, who says with great bitterness that "Oska Dymov sacrificed himself ... what a loss for science ... what talents ... if we were all compared to him, he was An extraordinary and great man ... a scientist, whom you can not find in the daytime with fire ..., ay-ay! " And then the author's sentence begins to sound harsh, since Chekhov begins to seriously denounce the stupidity, callousness and lack of spirituality of Olga Ivanovna.

The result

Russia has always been famous for women who know how to love and sympathize with their neighbor. So what happened to the contemporaries of the writer? An analysis of Chekhov's "Bouncing Up" reveals the author's personal attitude to such women as Olga Ivanovna. He begins to condemn the freedom of such women, their excessive autonomy and self-will, since he sees nothing good and positive in this.